Now that Facebook has made clear that it will not be promoting journalism to its users, all of the publishers who were getting much of their traffic there should look elsewhere. (Frederic Filloux of Monday Note has one of the best analyses of the company's announcement.)
What now? Well, there are several tactics and strategies that publishers can take to replace what they have lost (and will lose) from Facebook's pivot away from news. (I have also written about such strategies in Spanish.)
1. A tactic: start an email newsletter with links to your content. Think of it as a walled garden that protects you from Facebook.
Daily, weekly, or monthly newsletters create a more intimate relationship with users. Some publications have several on different topics, such as technology, business, public safety, or politics that users can select from. Local news sites in particular can benefit from daily newsletters.
The links to your content send users directly to your site, and any ad revenue goes to your business rather than Facebook. Many digital news publishers report higher response rates from email subscribers to offers of subscriptions, premium content, or memberships.
2. Focus on the quality of users instead of the quantity: relationship rather than scale, engagement rather than volume.
The metrics of the "attention web" focus on showing the
value of the audience's relationship with the media brand rather than
with an advertiser's product.
Showing posts with label engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label engagement. Show all posts
Thursday, January 18, 2018
How publishers can overcome loss of Facebook traffic
Labels:
business models,
credibility,
customer relations,
digital advertising,
email newsletters,
engagement,
Facebook,
native advertising,
social capital
Monday, December 18, 2017
Think small: the new metrics of engagement for news
Forget about the big numbers of total page views per month or unique users per month.
Those numbers are misleading and meaningless. They had meaning only in the days when the media business depended on mass media, massive audiences, and products aimed at the masses.
That was when the news media depended on advertising.
Today the business of media is all about touching potential customers with personalized, customized messages. It's about identifying the small number of people who are truly fans of your publication or the stars on your team. It's about strengthening the emotional attachment people have to your brand and its mission.
How the big numbers mislead us
In their very successful campaign to reach 1 million paid subscriptions for their digital-only edition, the Washington Post learned that the users most likely to subscribe came to their site three times a month.
![]() |
| Fans are engaged and willing to give their time and money. |
That was when the news media depended on advertising.
Today the business of media is all about touching potential customers with personalized, customized messages. It's about identifying the small number of people who are truly fans of your publication or the stars on your team. It's about strengthening the emotional attachment people have to your brand and its mission.
How the big numbers mislead us
In their very successful campaign to reach 1 million paid subscriptions for their digital-only edition, the Washington Post learned that the users most likely to subscribe came to their site three times a month.
Labels:
business models,
collaboration,
crowdfunding,
crowdsourcing,
digital journalism,
engagement,
subscriptions
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Web users are lazy, selfish and ruthless
(Versión en español aquí.)
Somebody brilliant said that, and if we need any proof we need look no further than a study by Comscore and the Newspaper Association of America.
The data show that the 108 million unique users of newspaper sites in June 2011 spent an average of just over a minute a day, 32 minutes a month, viewing their contents. (Updated July 2011.)
In a separate study, Facebook users were shown to be spending 14 times more time on that social networking site, or a total of 7 hours a month.
It´s one reason why newspapers are trying to make their contents part of that social web with strategies such as hiring community managers.
Somebody brilliant said that, and if we need any proof we need look no further than a study by Comscore and the Newspaper Association of America.
The data show that the 108 million unique users of newspaper sites in June 2011 spent an average of just over a minute a day, 32 minutes a month, viewing their contents. (Updated July 2011.)
In a separate study, Facebook users were shown to be spending 14 times more time on that social networking site, or a total of 7 hours a month.
It´s one reason why newspapers are trying to make their contents part of that social web with strategies such as hiring community managers.
Labels:
Comscore,
engagement,
Facebook,
newspapers,
Pew,
traffic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
